Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Llama 3-70B

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 40.3 to 12.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 77.8% for Grok-3 mini and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Llama 3-70B specifications
Grok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index41.028.5
Released2025-04-092024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3531

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13801206
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%35.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts13741195
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35122.91
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
DTBench—54.2%
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%4.3%
LMArena Math13861218
MATH Level 590.9%22.6%
Omni-MATH31.8%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
GPQA Diamond76.3%40.6%
LMArena Expert13951149
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English13521142
LMArena Chinese13871114
LMArena French13571231
LMArena German13501169
LMArena Japanese13431017
LMArena Korean13361017
LMArena Russian13521159
LMArena Spanish13791241

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following13561194
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query13721174
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text13701221
LMArena Creative Writing13421210
LMArena Multi-Turn13551223
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Llama 3-70B?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Llama 3-70B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper