Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Mercury

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.5 to 65.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 61.3% for Grok-3 mini and 21.6% for Mercury.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Mercury specifications
Grok-3 miniMercury
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index41.237.6
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked359

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
LMArena Coding13791322
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Mercury leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts13751285
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
LMArena Math1386—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
LMArena Non-English13521260
LMArena Chinese1387—
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—
LMArena Russian1353—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
LMArena Instruction Following13571239
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
LMArena Longer Query13721266
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury
LMArena Text13701282
LMArena Creative Writing13421191
LMArena Multi-Turn13551282
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Mercury?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Mercury better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper