Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Mercury 2

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Mercury 2 Inception

38.8

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.3 to 35.6.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Mercury 2 specifications
Grok-3 miniMercury 2
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index41.038.8
Released2025-04-092026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—50K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked3517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
WeirdML42.6%43.2%
LMArena Coding13801391
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1170
SciCode—38.7%
ALE-Bench—785.58

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts13741362
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
CritPt—0.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
LMArena Math1386—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Expert13951358
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.3%
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Non-English13521331
LMArena Chinese13871416
LMArena Russian13521303
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1350—
LMArena Japanese1343—
LMArena Korean1336—
LMArena Spanish1379—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following13561328
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Longer Query13721329
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Text13701355
LMArena Creative Writing13421289
LMArena Multi-Turn13551358
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Mercury 2?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Mercury 2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper