Model comparison

Grok 3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 13.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Grok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index39.948.5
Released2025-04-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14321504
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14341482
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math13911468
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
ProofBench—63%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14211501
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 3: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14101434
LMArena Chinese14481511
LMArena French14601475
LMArena Russian14161409
LMArena Spanish14171456
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14091463
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14391463
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14261455
LMArena Creative Writing14141400
LMArena Multi-Turn14251451
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper