Model comparison

Grok 3 vs MiniMax-M2.1

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.4

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.0 to 37.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 5.8% for Grok 3 and 11.8% for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
Grok 3MiniMax-M2.1
ProviderxAIMiniMax
Noometry Index39.638.4
Released2025-04-092025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked4022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Coding14321421
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1384
WeirdML37.2%—
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14331410
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.34—

Math Too close to call

Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Math13901396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%11.8%
LMArena Expert14201432
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English14111378
LMArena Chinese14481430
LMArena French14601405
LMArena German14311380
LMArena Japanese13891287
LMArena Korean13741297
LMArena Russian14161386
LMArena Spanish14171396

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following14091399
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query14391416
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text14261392
LMArena Creative Writing14141362
LMArena Multi-Turn14241396
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper