Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 3 leads 13.8 to 10.1.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1433 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.34 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1390 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1424 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.