Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.1

Rank #142 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.0 to 34.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Confabulations: 14.2% for Grok 3 and 21.8% for Qwen2.5-Max.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Grok 3Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.640.1
Released2025-04-092025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14321359
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Max leads

Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14331360
Epoch Capabilities Index138.34132.54
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math13901369
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
Confabulations14.2%21.8%
LMArena Expert14201337
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English14111352
LMArena Chinese14481382
LMArena French14601396
LMArena German14311350
LMArena Japanese13891299
LMArena Korean13741304
LMArena Russian14161353
LMArena Spanish14171377

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following14091335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Qwen2.5-Max leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query14391358
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14261367
LMArena Creative Writing14141339
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%72.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn14241364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 3 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.5 vs 41.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper