Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Grok 4.1 Fast and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 27.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index41.441.3
Released2025-06-27—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked3216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14111361
LMArena WebDev1242—
ALE-Bench394.93—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard69.6%—
τ²-bench Banking13.1%—
LMArena Search1171—
Vending-Bench 21,107—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14071374
SimpleBench56%—
NYT Connections (extended)87.4%—
DTBench87.7%—
ForecastBench61—

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14081359
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.9%—
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert13991339
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1201—

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English13911363
LMArena Chinese14411417
LMArena French14151391
LMArena German14041355
LMArena Japanese13491342
LMArena Korean13611351
LMArena Russian13871368
LMArena Spanish1413—

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following13761344

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query13901366

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14081377
LMArena Creative Writing13941359
LMArena Multi-Turn13891387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1327—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Grok 4.1 Fast and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper