Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.7 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 33.4.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1636 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47), Grok 4.7: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1464 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1406 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Grok 4.7 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.