Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 43.3 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), MiMo-V2-Omni: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1445 |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1428 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.