Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 42.1.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1208 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.