Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 44.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 29.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 44.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 30K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | 1516 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1477 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1516 |
Multimodal Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | 1266 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1424 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | 1465 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 44.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.