Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 24.7.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index45.537.7
Released2026-03-092025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output30K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$7.50
Results tracked2025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding14581413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14481372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14411364

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14451337

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14401345
LMArena Chinese14751356
LMArena French14671394
LMArena German14561324
LMArena Japanese14051309
LMArena Korean14161307
LMArena Russian14571367
LMArena Spanish14471360

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14201356

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14301379

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14501356
LMArena Creative Writing14351333
LMArena Multi-Turn14511365

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper