Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Step 3.5 Flash

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

41.7

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 21.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index45.541.7
Released2026-03-092026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output30K256K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Results tracked2019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14581436

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Step 3.5 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%28.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14481411

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14411408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14451422

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14401386
LMArena Chinese14751448
LMArena French14671421
LMArena German14561404
LMArena Japanese14051353
LMArena Korean14161350
LMArena Russian14571385
LMArena Spanish14471419

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14201385

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14301402

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14501403
LMArena Creative Writing14351357
LMArena Multi-Turn14511405

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 41.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Step 3.5 Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper