Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Llama 2-34B

Grok 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #22 Confirmed

Llama 2-34B Meta

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Grok 4.5 and Llama 2-34B specifications
Grok 4.5Llama 2-34B
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index55.0—
Released2026-07-082023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked5210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34), Llama 2-34B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1552—
SciCode54.1%—
WeirdML46.4%—
LMArena Coding1473—
ALE-Bench1,309—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15), Llama 2-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
APEX-Agents56.2%—
τ²-bench Banking47.9%—
PostTrainBench23.4%—
GBAEval65.4%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search1213—
Vending-Bench 23,887—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23), Llama 2-34B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
Epoch Capabilities Index154.02104.81
ARC-AGI-252.6%—
SimpleBench70%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.9%—
ARC-AGI-187.2%—
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles36%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1462—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA45.2%—
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—44.1%
PIQA—81.9%
WinoGrande—76.7%

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29), Llama 2-34B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench31%—
LMArena Math1457—
GSM8K—42.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21), Llama 2-34B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
GPQA Diamond93.4%—
SimpleQA Verified48.3%—
LMArena Expert1466—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—54.5%
BoolQ—83.7%
MMLU—62.6%
OpenBookQA—58.2%
TriviaQA—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63), Llama 2-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
LMArena Vision1287—
Blueprint-Bench 227.3%—
Furniture Assembly22.5%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43), Llama 2-34B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
LMArena Non-English1439—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1448—
LMArena Japanese1425—
LMArena Korean1402—
LMArena Russian1447—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45), Llama 2-34B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
LMArena Instruction Following1446—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54), Llama 2-34B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
LMArena Longer Query1463—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40), Llama 2-34B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Llama 2-34B
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1442—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—
LMArena Multi-Turn1457—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Llama 2-34B?

Grok 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Llama 2-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper