Model comparison
Grok 4.5 vs MiniMax M1
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 26.9.
- MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.5.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 55.0 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-08 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Max output | 500K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 52 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1359 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1553 | — |
| SciCode | 54.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,309 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 56.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 47.9% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 23.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,887 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1339 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 70% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 83.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 15.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 36% | — |
| DTBench | 96.5% | — |
| LMCA | 45.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 74.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.92 | — |
Math Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1361 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | 1317 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 48.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 27.3% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1448 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1353 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1446 | 1312 |
Long Context Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.5 better than MiniMax M1?
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 lists at $2 and $6.
Is Grok 4.5 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and MiniMax M1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.