Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 27.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.941.3
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14651361
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14471374
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14231359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert14671339
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14201363
LMArena Chinese14801417
LMArena French14611391
LMArena German14311355
LMArena Japanese13761342
LMArena Korean13971351
LMArena Russian14221368
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14311344

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14541366

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14281377
LMArena Creative Writing14281359
LMArena Multi-Turn14251387

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper