Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Laguna M.1

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 51% for Grok 4.6 and 0% for Laguna M.1.
  • Grok 4.6 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Laguna M.1
ProviderxAIPoolside
Noometry Index56.932.5
Released2026-08-122026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K262K
Max output500K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena WebDev16171349
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
LMArena Coding1465—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
ProofBench51%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1423—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1467—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1480—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Russian1422—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena Instruction Following1431—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena Longer Query1454—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna M.1
LMArena Text1428—
LMArena Creative Writing1428—
LMArena Multi-Turn1425—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Laguna M.1?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.6 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Laguna M.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper