Model comparison
Grok 4.6 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 15.5.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 56.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-12 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 67.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 48% | — |
| CursorBench | 41.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1617 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 25.3% | — |
| SciCode | 56.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 67.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,508 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,047 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 67.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 75.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 87.5% | — |
| CritPt | 19.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 30.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 48.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.44 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 66% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 99.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 51% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 49.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1467 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 40% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1480 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1376 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1404 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1454 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1428 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.6 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.6 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.