Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Phi-3.5-mini

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.6 leads 58.5 to 34.6.
  • Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.6 and Phi-3.5-mini specifications
Grok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index56.936.9
Released2026-08-122024-08-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked495

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding1465—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.5%
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—
LMArena Math1423—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1467—
BoolQ—78%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1480—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Russian1422—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Instruction Following1431—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1454—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1428—
LMArena Creative Writing1428—
LMArena Multi-Turn1425—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Grok 4.6 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper