Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Yi-34B

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.6 leads 63.3 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94% for Grok 4.6 and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Yi-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index56.927.8
Released2026-08-122023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Coding14651112
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471104
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44117.39
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Math14231114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond94%14.7%
LMArena Expert14671061
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14201079
LMArena Chinese14801176
LMArena French14611081
LMArena German14311042
LMArena Japanese1376993
LMArena Korean1397959
LMArena Russian14221050
LMArena Spanish14041070

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14311091

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14541094

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Yi-34B
LMArena Text14281129
LMArena Creative Writing14281108
LMArena Multi-Turn14251113

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Yi-34B?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Yi-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper