Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1318 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1315 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1275 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1289 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.