Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Sonar

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 21.1.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Sonar specifications
Grok 4.7Sonar
ProviderxAIPerplexity
Noometry Index53.138.5
Released2026-09-212024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K128K
Max output500K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1
Output $ / M tokens$6$1
Results tracked397

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1427—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1413—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1407—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Sonar
LMArena Text1399—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Sonar?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Is Grok 4.7 or Sonar better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper