Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 36.2.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Grok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index39.432.7
Released2025-09-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14291210
LMArena WebDev1159—
WeirdML42.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14121208
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14191208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1411—

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13961160
LMArena Chinese14571192
LMArena Russian13891187
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1383—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14151194
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14071218
LMArena Creative Writing13871199
LMArena Multi-Turn14141221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper