Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 4.7 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 43.2.

Side by side

Grok 4Grok 4.7
ProviderxAIxAI
Noometry Index47.846.6
Released2025-07-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked4821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Coding14081423
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1636
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.4%
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Grok 4.7: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts14091409
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
CritPt—17.7%
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Math14221393
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
ProofBench—34%
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Expert14171413
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Non-English14031392
LMArena Chinese14281476
LMArena Russian14091396
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1396—
LMArena Korean1376—
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following13871406
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query14091416
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.7
LMArena Text14121397
LMArena Creative Writing13971391
LMArena Multi-Turn14161389
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 49.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper