Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 42.2.

Side by side

Grok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index48.142.5
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14081390
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14091399
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14221414
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14151395
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14031395
LMArena Chinese14271425
LMArena Korean13771406
LMArena Russian14101385
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following13871374
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14091384
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14111401
LMArena Creative Writing13971392
LMArena Multi-Turn14161393
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper