Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4 leads 36.9 to 27.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 28% for Grok 4 and 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Side by side

Grok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index47.839.5
Released2025-07-092026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked487

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—
LMArena Coding1408—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles28%23%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46144.62
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1409—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
Omni-MATH60.3%—
LMArena Math1422—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond87%82.3%
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1417—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1403—
LMArena Chinese1428—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1396—
LMArena Korean1376—
LMArena Russian1409—
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
IFEval94.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1409—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1412—
LMArena Creative Writing1397—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1416—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper