Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 41.3.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderxAIArcee AI
Noometry Index48.138.6
Released2025-07-092026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked4824

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding14081381
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts14091350
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles28%—
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math14221366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert14151360
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English14031325
LMArena Chinese14271373
LMArena French14181374
LMArena German14291356
LMArena Japanese13941311
LMArena Korean13771306
LMArena Russian14101337
LMArena Spanish14201357

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following13871334
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query14091355
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text14111340
LMArena Creative Writing13971320
LMArena Multi-Turn14161342
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper