Model comparison

Hermes 4 405B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Hermes 4 405B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hermes 4 405B Nous Research

37.6

Unranked Sparse

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 26.1.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $3 for Hermes 4 405B.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Hermes 4 405B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Hermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderNous ResearchXiaomi
Noometry Index37.650.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1.05M
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.87
Results tracked219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hermes 4 405B: 26.1, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.8%—
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512

Math Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench—70%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

Hermes 4 405B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hermes 4 405B: 52.9, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1421—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is Hermes 4 405B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Hermes 4 405B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 4 405B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Hermes 4 405B lists at $1 and $3.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Hermes 4 405B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hermes 4 405B has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper