Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 46.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index37.044.4
Released—2026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding13071516

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12571481

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12691477

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12501516

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision11801266

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12361439
LMArena Chinese12891501
LMArena Russian12431424

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12501463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12791465

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12631459
LMArena Creative Writing12501408
LMArena Multi-Turn12531460

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper