Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.5.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.656.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13081502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12571496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12681499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12521507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision11801314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12361472
LMArena Chinese12871538
LMArena Russian12431481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12511479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12801489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12631483
LMArena Creative Writing12481479
LMArena Multi-Turn12541489

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.8 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper