Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 52.1 to 42.1.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index38.039.6
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1222

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding13071461
LMArena WebDev—1263

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12861436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.42

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math12811432

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert12761431

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English12651405
LMArena Chinese13461443
LMArena Russian12661396
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following12771414

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query13421414

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text12881421
LMArena Creative Writing12641372
LMArena Multi-Turn12841423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper