Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 38.7.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index42.559.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1353

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Coding13901508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts13991496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Math14141491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Expert13951521
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English13951466
LMArena Chinese14251529
LMArena Korean14061458
LMArena Russian13851482
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following13741483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query13841494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Kimi K3
LMArena Text14011476
LMArena Creative Writing13921454
LMArena Multi-Turn13931488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper