Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Step 3.7 Flash
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 21.6.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.