Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 35.6.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index39.654.8
Released—2026-09-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding13191514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts13081503
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Math12731494
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English12851481
LMArena Chinese13581529
LMArena Russian13051490
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following12781477

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query13091488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text13111490
LMArena Creative Writing12691455
LMArena Multi-Turn13031482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper