Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs QwQ-32B
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and QwQ-32B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 39.8.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1324 |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than QwQ-32B?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and QwQ-32B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.