Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Step 3
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
StepFunSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.5 to 50.4.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1331 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | 1332 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Step 3?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Step 3 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.