Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 37.5.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.359.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1653

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Coding13611508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Math13591491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Expert13391521
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English13631466
LMArena Chinese14171529
LMArena French13911491
LMArena German13551488
LMArena Japanese13421487
LMArena Korean13511458
LMArena Russian13681482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following13441483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query13661494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Kimi K3
LMArena Text13771476
LMArena Creative Writing13591454
LMArena Multi-Turn13871488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Kimi K3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper