Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Step 3

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 5 categories and Step 3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.5 to 54.5.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
ProviderTencentStepFun
Noometry Index40.639.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Coding13611367

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Math13591366

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Expert13381333

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Vision—1176

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Non-English13621327
LMArena Chinese14161396
LMArena German13561371
LMArena Korean13511271
LMArena Russian13681331
LMArena French1390—
LMArena Japanese1338—
LMArena Spanish—1372

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13441332

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13651326

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Text13771351
LMArena Creative Writing13581322
LMArena Multi-Turn13871340

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Step 3?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Step 3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.3 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper