Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 28.9.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index43.159.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked953

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Coding14181508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts14161496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%
LMArena Math—1491

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521

Multimodal Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Vision1180—
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English13821466
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following13971483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query14041494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Kimi K3
LMArena Text14051476
LMArena Creative Writing13881454
LMArena Multi-Turn14221488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Kimi K3 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper