Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiniMax-M3

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where MiniMax-M3 leads 40.2 to 35.7.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index43.143.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding14181469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts14161447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%
LMArena Math—1429

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1461

Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision11801253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English13821420
LMArena Chinese—1463
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following13971433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query14041445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5MiniMax-M3
LMArena Text14051433
LMArena Creative Writing13881404
LMArena Multi-Turn14221442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiniMax-M3?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.8 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiniMax-M3 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper