Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 54.0 to 28.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index43.154.8
Released—2026-09-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding14181514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts14161503
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision11801309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English13821481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following13971477

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query14041488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text14051490
LMArena Creative Writing13881455
LMArena Multi-Turn14221482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper