Model comparison
Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.5
Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 36.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1438 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1469 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1450 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1416 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1434 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than MiMo-V2.5?
Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.
Is Hy3 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.