Model comparison
Hy3 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 26.1.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1445 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1430 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1434 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1428 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.
Is Hy3 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 43.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.