Model comparison

Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.1

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 37.4 to 25.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 16.8% for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.5 specifications
Hy3MiniMax-M2.5
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index43.638.1
Released2026-07-062026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$1.20
Results tracked1733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena WebDev15091386
LMArena Coding14651380
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
ALE-Bench—618.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%16.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14491372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Math14751378
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert14611378
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English14271338
LMArena Chinese14961392
LMArena French14611363
LMArena Korean13901232
LMArena Russian14351359
LMArena Spanish14481354
LMArena German—1361
LMArena Japanese—1169

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14251353

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query14431367
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text14421359
LMArena Creative Writing13991331
LMArena Multi-Turn14361364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than MiniMax-M2.5?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.5?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 46.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper