Model comparison

Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 48.5.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.

Side by side

Hy3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Hy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderTencentNVIDIA
Noometry Index43.639.3
Released2026-07-062026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$0.16
Results tracked1718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding14651370
LMArena WebDev1509—

Reasoning Too close to call

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts14491335
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math14751355

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert14611354

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English14271292
LMArena Chinese14961356
LMArena French14611369
LMArena Korean13901233
LMArena Russian14351257
LMArena Spanish14481321
LMArena German—1280
LMArena Japanese—1213

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following14251317

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query14431312

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text14421324
LMArena Creative Writing13991254
LMArena Multi-Turn14361327
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

Is Hy3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper