Noometry

Model comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 26× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 26.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 85.1% for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy3Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.251.5
Released2026-07-062026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$7.50
Results tracked1933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev15081515
LMArena Coding14641498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%85.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14471483
SimpleBench—70.4%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math14751490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert14601488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14261474
LMArena Chinese14931530
LMArena Russian14321484
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1439—
LMArena Japanese1392—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14261460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14421482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14391476
LMArena Creative Writing14021449
LMArena Multi-Turn14361481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 26× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is Hy3 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper