Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs MiniMax-M2.7

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 24.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 75% for Hy4 preview and 3% for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and MiniMax-M2.7 specifications
Hy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index44.637.4
Released2026-08-282026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.20
Results tracked330

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena WebDev16331397
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
LMArena Coding—1454
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1422
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.84

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
ProofBench75%3%
LMArena Math—1420

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%
LMArena Expert—1443

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English—1382
LMArena Chinese—1439
LMArena French—1422
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1261
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Russian—1383
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query—1419

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text—1404
LMArena Creative Writing—1354
LMArena Multi-Turn—1413

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper