Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Qwen1.5-110B

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 31.1.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Hy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.633.6
Released2026-08-282024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.83—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked320

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena WebDev1633—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LMArena Coding—1184
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1168
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1185

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English—1142
LMArena Chinese—1206
LMArena French—1150
LMArena German—1123
LMArena Japanese—1074
LMArena Korean—1044
LMArena Russian—1118
LMArena Spanish—1141

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following—1158

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query—1157

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text—1175
LMArena Creative Writing—1148
LMArena Multi-Turn—1160

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hy4 preview or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen1.5-110B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper