Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-30B-A3B costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 37.4.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 41K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Hy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index45.338.9
Released2026-08-282025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M41K
Max output64K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.50
Results tracked332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena WebDev1632—
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
LMArena Coding—1416

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1398
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1394

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
LMArena Expert—1396

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1372
LMArena Chinese—1433
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1337
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Russian—1370
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1363

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text—1384
LMArena Creative Writing—1317
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1378

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-30B-A3B costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper